अनुवाद Übersetzen sie Traduisez ترجم
перевести Traduca Traduzca 翻译

Telegraph stamps of the World

Click here for a site-map.
Select currency. Default = GBP (1.0)
GB £   US $   Can $   Aus $
Euro   Other
Up a level
Argentina Bolivia Chile Columbia Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Rep. Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala
Argentina Bolivia Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Rep. Ecuador El Salvador Guatemala
Up a level
Honduras Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Puerto Rico Uruguay Venezuela
Honduras Mexico Morocco Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Puerto Rico Uruguay Venezuela

 

Contributors:

RL - Rolf Lamprecht.

 

 

Shortcuts to different sections
1881 5c 1881 10c 1881 20c 1881 50c 1881 1p Cat. Especializado 1886 + Obligatory Tax stamps Cancels AR stamps Coupons Seals

 

Colombia.

Steve Hiscocks recognised that these telegraph stamps were a challenge. I have read all I could find on these issues, but none matched the facts.
I realize that I am new to this and the novice should not challenge acknowledged experts, but I feel I have to. I state my case below. Challenges are welcome.


  I have completely revised Hiscocks' original listing, though leaving references to the original designations.  
I have brought the prices up to date and added currency selection.
The new designations have 'RH' numbers (Revised Hiscocks) to avoid confusion.
CheckList         Setup

 

1881 Lithographed on wove paper. No watermark or part of sheet watermark (see Note 6 after RH19). Imperf.
Printed in Bogotá by León F. Paredes and Demitrio Villaveces.
Around about 1883 the colours were changed, apperently in response to the UPU.
In 1886 the "United States of Colombia" became the Republic of Colombia and there were design changes to the stamps.

There are many different opinions on the early issues, mainly due to the lack of records and dated pieces.
Most people agree on the colours of the earliest stamps though, with the possible exception of the 1 Peseta value,
and I have tried to find the most likely sequence assuming only one thing changing at a time.
I have needed to add a few types but I've kept the listing compatible with the original where possible.
My images for the earliest issues are at 600dpi to show details.

The Colombian coat of arms is central to the design. It was involved in many of the changes in this issue.

Colombian Coat of Arms

For that reason, a description is worthwhile.
Above the shield are the words "Libertad Y Orden" meaning "Liberty and Order". Below that are two 'cornucopia' separated by a pomegranate.
Below that is a 'Phrygian cap' on the end of a spear and below that, two ships separated by the Isthmus of Panama (then part of Colombia).

 

5c. (600 dpi)

Colombia 5c type I, lilac Colombia 5c type I, lilac Colombia 5c type I, blue (large)
Type I in lilac. (RH1)
Lines of shading clearly printed.
Type I in lilac. (RH1)
Though lightly printed, the shading can be seen each side of the cap.
I don't have any of these in blue, but they may exist.
Type II in blue. (mark above 'N' of 'CINCO', RH7 )
Though strongly printed, the shading is mostly gone each side of the cap.
I don't have any of these in lilac, but they may exist.

 

Colombia 5c type I, blue (large) Colombia 5c differences Colombia 5c type II, blue
Type II in blue (RH7),
seems to be the same die but shading weak.
Key areas of differences.
Shading left or right.   Size of '5', larger in type III (thinner white circle).
Type III in blue (RH14).
Shading back and the eagles head is more upright.

 

 

10c. (600 dpi)

It was thought that there were just two types of the 10c with the first being in two colours.
Now I have a few more examples that I can look at closely however, it is not that simple.

Colombia 10c type Ia, green-blue Colombia 10c type Ia, green-blue
Type I (RH2) in blue-green. Some variability depending on amount of ink.
Note the pomegranite, cap, ships and shading below between the value tablets.

 

Colombia 10c type I, red Colombia 10c type II, red Colombia 10c differences
Type I (RH8) in red. This is like the blue-green type.
Mint ones seem to be elusive.
Type II (RH8a) in red. The 'split' in the pomegranite is confined to the top.
The cap has a strong 'blob' in the right side. The top ship seems different.
The horizontal lines between the bottom value tablets get progressively weak.
Type II Key areas of differences compared to Type III below.
'Finger' raised and central or not.

 

Colombia 10c type III Colombia 10c type III Colombia 10c type III - no dots
Type III in red (RH15).
The stars above the eagle are clearer and spread wider.
Type III in red (RH15a). - Only one of the '0's has dots (see below). Type III (RH15a) - None of the '0's have dots (see below) - From RL

I have only a few examples of Type III. Until recently they have all been 'normal'.
I was puzzled by John Barefoot saying of them "no dots in the '0's of the '10's.", since mine had dots in all the zeroes, just like the previous issues.
I put it down to only seeing low-resolution images. Then I got one with only one dot.

I cannot see anything obvious suggesting a different plate, but the dot-sizes do seem to vary.
Perhaps the same plate has varying numbers of dots per stamp ?

Here is a strip of three:
Colombia 10c RH15a strip
Clearly not very consistent.

 

Colombia 10c type II   Colombia 10c type II
I additionally have this item. I do not know if the paper colouring is genuine !
For the moment I will ignore it.

 

 

20c. (600 dpi)

Colombia 20c type I, red Colombia 20c flaw, red Colombia 20c red-brown differences
Type Ia in red (RH3)
(not yet seen in brown).
Type Ib in red (RH3a)
(not yet seen in brown).
Details marked in red are specific to the brown printings.
The flaw marked in blue is on all the red printings, but none of the brown.
Most of the red printings have the flaw marked in green is on, used ones usually without it.

Though printing flaws on these stamps are so common that it is difficult to find examples without any, some flaws are consistent. Those are flaws on the plate.
Whether such a flaw a feature of all stamps on a different plate, or on just some stamps of the familiar one is not always easy to determine.
I have scans of 17 of the 20c red stamps. Only 2 of them are used, both are Type Ia. Only one of the mint stamps are Type Ia, the rest being Type 1b.
Type Ia tends to be more red in colour while Ib are more red-orange, but much depends on toning of the paper. The brown printings are distinctly different.

 

Colombia 20c type Ib, brown Colombia 20c type Ic, brown Colombia 20c type II, brown
Type IIa in brown. (RH9)
No shading on central and top shield-panel and cap.
Type IIb in brown. (RH9a)
Shading added, but different to the red printings.
Type IIc in brown. (RH10)
Shading removed from between lower value tablets.

 

Colombia 20c differences Colombia 20c type III, brown
Key areas of differences.
wheel in 2D or 3D. Shading or not. Phrygian cap.
Type III in brown, wheel in 3D. (RH16)
Eagles head more upright. Shading back, cap drawn badly.

 

Shades of RH16:

Colombia 20c type RH16 Colombia 20c type RH16a Colombia 20c type RH16b
RH16 - reddish brown. RH16a - orange-brown. RH16b - chocolate-brown.

 

50c. (600 dpi) I have tried to find indicators to help in sequencing them.

Colombia 50c type I, ultramarine Colombia 50c type I, ultramarine Colombia 50c type I, green ?
Type Ia (RH4) in ultramarine, No 'Y' flaw. Good quality printing. Type Ia (RH4a) in blue. Beginnings of 'Y' flaw (see below). Type Ia (RH4b) in blue-green. No 'Y' flaw. Average quality printing.

 

Colombia 50c type I, blue-green ? Colombia 50c type I, violet Colombia 50c type I, violet
Type Ia (RH4b) in blue-green. Beginnings of 'Y' flaw (see below). Type Ia in lilac (RH11). Reasonable quality print, with no sign of
'Y' flaw and early type 'Phrygian cap'. Fine lines visible.
.
Type Ib in lilac (RH12). Poor quality print, but showing
'Y' flaw and early type 'Phrygian cap'. No fine lines visible.
.

 

Colombia 50c type II, violet Colombia 50c differences Colombia 50c type II, lilac
Type II in violet (RH17). Cap changed (solid base), and also
the shading each side of it. The ships are larger.
Key areas of differences. 'Y' flaw inset at top-left. Cap changes,
ship sizes change. 'Shading behind '50' of varying visibility, motto varying clarity.
Type II in pale violet (RH17). Quality degraded, but new type cap
apparent and 'Y' flaw progressing. Fine lines just visible.

 

Colombia 50c type II, proof Colombia 50c type II, violet on buff Colombia 50c type II, violet on buff
Type II Proof showing some interesting flaws in addition to the 'Y' flaw.
Note the two scratches half way up on the right and marks below the value.
Image courtesy of Auktionshaus Christoph Gärtner.
Type II in pale violet on buff (RH17a). Poor quality prints, showing 'Y' flaw. Fine lines visible.

 

The key difference is the Phrygian cap which changes from an unshaded base to a heavily shaded base.
The 'Y' flaw that is constant on all but one of my violet stamps, is only on one out of four of the blue.

Colombian Coat of Arms  Coat of Arms on early 50c  Coat of Arms on early 50c 

On the early example, the wording and cap are clear and the ships appear narrower than the cap.
On the later ones, the wording is hard to make out, the cap looks like a pregnant rabbit and the ships are wider.
The shading each side of the cap are slightly different.

 

Proofs

This combination proof is interesting as it presumably shows the state of these 4 values at the same point in time.
The 5c has no shading at each side of the cap and shows the scratch above the 'N', so Type II.
The 10c has a lack of shading between the values, so Type II again.
The 20c also lacks shading between the value tablets. Again Type II(c).
The 50c has a nice clear impression, complete with 'Y' faw and 'rabbit', so Type II again.
If only it were dated!   Image courtesy of Auktionshaus Christoph Gärtner.

 

1p. There seems to be more types than is at first apparent.

Colombia 1p type I, brown Colombia 1p type I, black Colombia 1p differences Colombia 1p type II, black Colombia 1p type II, brown
Type I in brown (RH5). Type I in black on greenish paper. (RH6) Type II in black (RH13). Type III in black (RH18). Type III in brown (RH19).
Colombia 1p type I, brown Colombia 1p type I, black Colombia 1p type II, black Colombia 1p type III, black Colombia 1p type III, brown
Some of mine - Key areas of differences, though I am unsure of the sequence.

 

Again here, there are marked differences of quality between different Types. I have not yet seen Type II in brown.
It is interesting to compare the frame with the later (1901, very similar) One Peso type 24 below.

Blocks make it easier to distinguish plate flaws from random printing flaws.


Colombia 1p block in brown Colombia 1p block in black
Type I in brown (RH5). Type II in black (RH13).

 

Colombia 1p block in black Colombia 1901 1p block in black
Type III in black (RH18). 1901 1 peso Type (RH35).

Clearly there are (at least) 3 different Types of these.
I have labelled them as I, II and III, but it is not certain what order they were in.
Type III is different to the others. The 'guide lines' surrounding each stamp are different, the black spots in the '1's are bigger.
I notice that some postage stamps were later 'reprinted' (with different plates). Perhaps some of these are 'reprints'.

I would expect the frame on the 1901 stamps to be more similar to the last of the Samuel Morse stamps,
Also if 3 plates were produced, I would like to think that later ones were improvements.
It may be that Type III was an early attempt, followed by Type II and then Type I. Or it might be that Type III is a forgery.
I have not yet seen any (genuine-looking) used copies of these stamps.
If there was little usage, and the stamps are not particularly rare, there seems little point in forging them.

Colombia 1p type I, brown, without dots.
This would seem to be a Type I with the dots in the '1's virtually missing, the top-left is barely perceptible (RH5a).

RH # Type. was Description Mint Used
RH1 1 H1 5c pale lilac to lilac (shades) Type I 1.80 2.50
RH1a   H1a         showing part of sheet watermark 4.50 4.50
RH1b   H1b         on bluish paper 2.50 3.00
RH2 2 H2 10c greenish blue to bluish green (shades) Type I 2.40 3.00
RH2a   H2a         on bluish paper 9.00 9.00
RH3 3 H3 20c red on bluish paper Type Ia 25.00 6.00
RH3a   H3a         red to orange-red (shades) Type Ib 4.50 4.50
RH4 4 H4 50c ultramarine / bluish paper Type Ia 4.00 3.60
RH4a   H4a         blue / bluish paper Type Ia 6.00 6.00
*RH4b   -         blue-green. Type Ia 20.00 20.00
RH5 5 H5 1p brown(shades) / buff (shades) Type I 4.00 6.00
*RH5a   -         without dots in '1's Type I 30.00 30.00
RH6   H12 1p black / pale green to greenish buff Type I 6.00 9.00

* RH4b and RH5a have been added due to examples shown above.

 

Note. See notes following stamps of 1886.

 

1882 Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

RH # Type. was Description Mint Used
RH7 1 H7 5c blue to greenish blue (shades) Type II 3.00 1.80
RH8 2 H8 10c red Type I 2.50 2.00
RH8a   H8a         on bluish paper Type II 12.00 9.00
RH9 3 H9 20c light brown Type IIa 3.00 3.00
RH9a   H9a         on bluish paper Type IIb 4.50 4.50
RH10 6 H10 20c light-reddish brown (shades) Type IIc 2.50 2.50
RH10a   H10a         on bluish paper 4.50 4.50
RH11 4 - 50c pale bright lilac (shades) Type Ia 10.00 10.00
RH12   H16 50c pale bright lilac (shades) Type Ib 4.50 5.50
RH13 5 H6 1p black / buff (paper shades) Type II 5.00 6.50

 

Note. See Hiscocks' notes following stamps of 1886.

 

 

CATALOGO ESPECIALIZADO L.T.

I have been shown pages from a specialised catalogue (in Spanish and also printed in 1982) called "CATALOGO ESPECIALIZADO L.T." that
is normally used by Colombian collectors. (can anyone supply more information? ISBN ?)
It is arranged rather differently to Hiscocks' book, making no reference to different dies except the clearly obvious ones, and using 'issue numbers' for the different series of stamps.
I attempted to merge/cross reference the two approaches but have now abandoned that due to inconsistencies.

Before 1886, 'CE' lists 5 series of stamps against 2 series listed by Hiscocks, but used stamps are not priced.
'CE' shows illustrations against each series, but is seemingly unaware of any die differences,
making the distinctions instead on the basis of colour and paper, without dated copies. Truly amazing!

'CE' lists a series for each year up to 1886.
My thanks to David Eraso Alvear of Davidcol on delcampe for help with this.


'CE' starts (page 231) with some notes that I will attempt to translate:

1. Telegraph stamps are a true philatelic mode, since they were required for a form of social communication.
2. In the early times of our philately postage and telegraph stamps were both collected.
    The second form has fallen into disuse because of the lack of them, and because they were discontinued.
3. Our telegraph stamps were in effect for 25 years, from 1881 to 1906.
4. Among these there are no known fakes.
5. The major part of our series of telegraph stamps are imperforate. Perforated are scarce.
6. They were printed in Bogotá by León F. Paredes and Demitrio Villaveces using monochrome lithography,
    on various papers, white or colored, with a thickness characteristic of the time.
7. The cancellations were usually in indelible black pen. Some however were also cancelled with rubber
    using black, purple or blue ink:
    a)   Stamped "FRANCA" in pointed oval, black ink.
    b)   Stamped monogrammed "TN" inside a double oval with blue ink (about the 1886 issue).
    c)   Violet cancel with the word "cancelada" within double circle (about the 1896 issue).
8. Viñetas (bullets). [seals]
    Early in the 20th. century we find that to seal telegrams 'bullets' were used without any face value.
    There are three types of them:
    Type I   In red and chestnut imprint 'Lit. Nacional'.
    Type II   In blue imprint 'Lit. Nacional'.
    Type III   In brown tones imprint 'Lit. Colombia Bogotá '.

 

I have detailed my reasons for rejecting the CE listing of these issues on my Colombia CE page.

 

Though I have given up on the bulk of the catalogue, there is one part that might have merit.
His list of the papers used in different years might be based on those used for dated postage stamps of the time. Here is his table:

Series Year Paper
1 1881 white
2 1882 blue and transparent
3 1883 white
4 1884 bluish
5 1885 white
6 1886 bluish

I have to say that I find it suspicious that the paper colours alternate so regularly. I have my doubts.

 

 

 

Back to Hiscocks listing.

1886 (6th. issue). Similar to above but from redrawn dies (see notes below). No watermark. Imperf.

RH # CE# Type. was Description Mint Used
RH14 26 7 H13 5c deep dull blue to dull blue Type III 3.60 3.60
RH15 27 8 H14 10c red (slight shades) Type III 3.00 3.60
*RH15a -   -         1 or more dots missing from '0's 10.00 10.00
*RH15b 27a   -         perf.12 - -
RH16 28 9 H15 20c reddish brown (shades) Type III 2.40 3.00
RH16a 28a   H15a         orange-brown 3.00 3.60
RH16b -   -         chocolate-brown 6.00 4.00
RH17 29 10 H11 50c reddish violet to pale violet (shades) Type II 3.50 5.50
*RH17a -   -         50c pale violet on buff Type II 10.00 12.00
*RH18 30 5 - 1p black / straw Type III 15.00 12.00
*RH19 -   - 1888? 1p brown Type III 25.00 25.00

* I have added RH15b to accommodate 'CE'#27a (27 is listed as red-orange). I have not seen one.
I have added RH18 as 'CE' lists a 1p value in the 6th. series distinguished only by the paper colour. I have some that could be this.
I have added RH19 to accommodate a type illustrated.

 

Hiscocks added the following 7 notes:

Note 1. The 1881, 82 and 86 issues present problems in that there seem, from examination of my stocks,
                to be more dies than described in previous catalogues and, furthermore, when these are set in
                what appears to be a logical sequence they no longer match previously described colour shade
                sequences. Shades are however very variable and atypical examples could originally have been
                used so I have , pending further information, adopted the more logical die sequence.
                This is described in the following notes.

                Unfortunately very few Colombian Telegraph stamps were date cancelled — a cross, scribble,
                or number of unknown significance in pen or occasionally crayon was normal throughout the
                period. I would like to hear from anyone who can assign unambiguous dates to the various dies.
Note 2. The 5 cents are well behaved with the single new die being introduced in (reportedly) 1886.
                The 1881 is easily distinguishable by colour but the shades of the 1882 and 1886 issues overlap.
                There are however several die differences (see 1 and 7) — the lower pair of '5's are larger and
                surrounded by a narrower white ring in Type II. The easiest difference to see, without copies
                of both for comparison, is in the white triangle above the lower left '5' — in Type I
                there is a heavy line down its right (inner)side and in Type II down its left (outer) side.
Note 3. The 10 cents of 1882 and 1886 are again of the same colour but the different dies are clearly
                illustrated in 2 and 8.
Note 4. The 20 cents seems to show three types (3, 6, 9). Type III is clearly distinguished by the wheel at
                centre top being directed out of the paper over your left shoulder with the wings issuing from its
                hub. Type I was used in 1881 (red) and 1882 (brown) while Type II (also brown) was
                presumably issued at some unknown date between 1882 and 1886. Type II differs from Type I
                in that the area between the "viente centavos" and the base of the medalion is unshaded in
                Type II but shaded in Type I.
Note 5. Types I and II of the 50 cents differ in that in Type I the '50's in the two lower corners are against
                a shaded background while in Type II the background is white. Those of 1881 are clearly
                distinguishable by colour and are of Type I. The lilacs of Type I vary greatly in shade but are
                often bright and clear while those of Type II are usually paler and very indistinctly printed.
                Previous catalogues suggest that the brighter colour should be attributed to 1886 but this would
                mean the introduction of Type II in 1882 and a return to Type I in 1886.
                I have assumed Type I was used in 1881 and 1882 and Type II introduced in 1886.
Note 6. While all the preceding stamps have been described as having no watermark some are printed
                on paper bearing a sheet watermark 'A PIRIE & SONS' in partially double block letters,
                160 x 18mm overall, down the sheet and thus affecting seven or fourteen stamps out of the
                sheet of 100. Observed in sheets of No. 1, No. 11 and No. 15(a). [Now RH1a, RH11?, RH16a]
Note 7. Illustrations 1 to 10 are at actual size (as compared with the usual reduction of 33%)
                to aid comparison.

My Note: The watermark 'A PIRIE & SONS' relates to Alexander Pirie and Sons, Stoneywood Mill,
on the river Don near Aberdeen in Scotland. I am not aware of them producing blued paper.
It is also reported on RH8. These would be worth a premium.

 

1888 (CE 7th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

Colombia type 11 Colombia type 12 Type 13 - H19 Type 13 - H20
Type 11 Type 12 Type 13   - RH22 Type 13   - RH23

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1888 Description Mint Used
RH20 31 11 H17 10c brown / buff 20.00 6.00
RH21 32 12 H18 20c dull blue / pinkish white 30.00 6.00
RH21a -   H18a         blue / pinkish white 30.00 6.00
RH21b -   H18b         blue / yellowish white 35.00 9.00
RH22 33 13 H19 50c black / buff to yellow-buff 6.00 4.50
RH23 33a 13 H20 50c black / pale yellowish grey 9.00 5.00

Hiscocks added the following note:

Note. The 50c was printed in violet in 1902 (No. 40).

 

1891 (CE 8th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

Colombia type 14 Colombia type 15 Colombia type 16 Colombia H24
Type 14 Type 15 Type 16 Type 17   RH27

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1891 Description Mint Used
RH24 34 14 H21 5c red 50.00 35.00
RH25 *** 15 H22 10c red-brown to brown (shades) / pale buff (Type I) 4.50 3.00
RH25a -   H22a         brown / bluish grey 12.00 12.00
RH26 35 16 H23 10c red-brown to brown (shades) / pale buff (Type II) 15.00 6.00
RH27 36 17 H24 20c blue (shades) / white 18.00 6.00
RH27a -   H24a         blue (shades) / pinkish bluish (shades) 18.00 12.00
RH27b -   H24b         blue (shades) / blue 2.70 2.40

*** For a change, type 15 is one that 'CE' does not appear to mention !
The Yvert & Tellier 2005 catalogue lists type 15 as their type 20 but does not list type 16.
These two appear to be getting confused with each other.

Colombia H24a Colombia H24b
Type 17   RH27a - from RL Type 17   RH27b

Hiscocks added the following note:

Note. Types 15 and 16 differ in the size of the centre shield.

My note: It is easier to see the differences in the distance between the eagles head and the frame above.

 

The 'CE' 9th. issue (numbered 37 to 39) was for the Department of Panama and so Hiscocks lists them as H1, H2 and H3 under Panama

 

 

1896 (CE 10th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

Colombia type 18 Colombia type 19 Colombia type 20 Colombia type 21
Type 18 Type 19 Type 20 Type 21

For Type 18 perforated see H52.

RH # CE# Type. was 1896 Description Mint Used
RH28 *40 18 H25 10c yellow-brown (shades) / buff to salmon 3.00 1.80
RH29 41 19 H26 20c deep greenish blue (shades) / pale blue 4.00 1.80
RH29a 41b   H26a         deep greenish blue (shades) / bluish grey 6.00 3.00
RH29b -   H26b         violet blue / bluish grey 12.00 4.00
RH29c 41a   H26c         ultramarine / pinkish blue 12.00 8.00
RH30 43 20 H27 1p green to bluish green / pale green to bluish green 12.00 6.00
RH31 42 21 H28 1p green (shades) / pale green (shades) 15.00 10.00

* 'CE' list 40a as a perf.12 variety. Hiscocks lists this as H52 below.

 

Some Type-19 shades I have, showing the backs. I will look out for more.

Type-19 shades
Type-19 backs
RH29 RH29a RH29b RH29c

 

Colombia type 22 - shade 2 Colombia type 24 Type 24 proof
Type 22 on buff - RH32 (see also RH45) Type 24 - RH35 Type 24 - Proof in blue
courtesy of Auktionshaus Christoph Gärtner.

 

Colombia H30 Colombia RH33a Colombia H31a Colombia H31
Type 23 - RH33 Type 23 - RH33a Type 23 - RH34 shades

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1901 Description Mint Used
RH32 44 22 H29 10c bistre-brown (shades) / buff (shades) 4.00 3.00
RH33 45 23 H30 20c blue / dull violet blue (shades) 4.50 1.80
*RH33a -   -         blue / blue 12.50 5.00
RH33b *45g   -         blue / pink - -
RH34 45a 23 H31 20c greenish blue (shades) / pale bluish green 4.50 1.80
RH35 46 24 H32 1p black / pale yellow 4.00 4.00

* I have added RH33a due to the single example shown that I have seen. It is distinctly different to the others.

*In 'CE' the 1901 20c stamps are all described as blue, but on different shades of paper. I have tried to match them up.
I have added RH33b to accommodate 'CE45g'. CE also lists this perf.12 as 'CE45e' and tête-bêche pair as 'CE45f', all with minimal prices.
The Yvert & Tellier 2005 catalogue does not list any of these. Until I see one, I will treat them as suspect.

For Type 22 see also RH45.

 

1902 (CE 12th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

Type-23 - H33 Type-23 - H34
Type 23 - RH36 Type 23 - RH37

 

Type-23 - H36 Type-23 - H36a Type-21 - RH40
Type 23 - RH39 Type 23 - RH39a Type 21 - RH40 -   from RL

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1902 Description Mint Used
RH36 47 23 H33 20c red / yellow 15.00 15.00
RH37 48 23 H34 20c violet-brown / yellow 50.00 50.00
RH38 *49 23 H35 20c green / yellow 60.00 60.00
RH39 *49 23 H36 20c dull blue / pale greenish yellow 8.00 8.00
RH39a *49   H36a         blue / pale yellow 10.00 9.00
RH40 50 21 H37 1p rose / pink 40.00 40.00

* In 'CE' these are all lumped together as 'azul verdoso' - greenish blue.
47, 48 and 49 are priced equally with 50 priced nearly 4 times as much.

 

1902 (CE 13th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Perf 13½

H38 taken from Hiscocks H39 taken from Hiscocks H40 taken from Hiscocks H41
Type 22   RH41 Type 23   RH42 Type 13   RH43 Type 21   RH44

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1902 Description Mint Used
RH41 51 22 H38 10c brown / olive-green 12.00 12.00
RH42 52 23 H39 20c red / yellow 10.00 10.00
RH43 53 13 H40 50c violet / white 12.00 12.00
RH44 54 21 H41 1p rose pink 15.00 14.00

 

1904 (CE 14th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

Colombia type 22 Colombia type 25 Colombia type 26 Colombia type 27 Colombia type 28
Type 22 on cinnamon (RH45, see also RH32) Type 25   RH46 Type 26   RH47 Type 27   RH48 Type 28   RH49

 

Colombia type 29 Colombia type 30 Colombia type 31 Colombia type 32
Type 29   RH50 Type 30   RH51 Type 31   RH52 Type 32   RH53

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1904 Description Mint Used
RH45 55 22 H42 10c yellow-brown (shades) / cinnamon 2.40 1.80
RH46 56 25 H43 20c red / yellow-buff 15.00 15.00
RH47 57 26 H44 40c blue / yellow-buff 6.00 6.00
RH48 58 27 H45 60c brown / pink 6.00 6.00
RH49 59 28 H46 80c red / pale greenish blue 4.50 4.50
RH50 60 29 H47 1p green / pale green 12.00 12.00
RH51 61 30 H48 2p violet / pink 3.00 3.00
RH52 62 31 H49 5p brown (shades) / yellow-buff 4.00 3.00
RH53 - 32 H50 10p blue / pale bluish yellow 15.00 4.50
RH53a 63   H50a         blue / pale blue 18.00 6.00

Hiscocks added the following note:

Note. The separation of [RH32] and [RH45] by colour is easy at the extremes
                — both the design and paper colours of [RH45] are much more 'golden' —
                but I also have copies of design colour of [RH32] on paper more appropriate
                to [RH45]. Pending further information I have not allocated these.
                There appears to be no change of die to help us.

 

 

1905(?) Wove paper. No watermark. Perf 10½

RH # CE# Type. was 1905 Description Mint Used
RH54 22 H51 10c yellow-brown / cinnamon 30.00 30.00

Hiscocks added the following note:

Note. This stamp does not seem to have been catalogued previously.

 

 

10c-pin-perf H53 H53a H54
Type 18 RH55a - pin-perf Type #22 - RH56 Type #22 - RH56a   -   from RL Type #23 - RH57

 

H55 H58 H59
Type #23 - RH58 Type #31 - RH61 Type #32 - RH62

The 10c is pin-perf measuring about perf.15½ (perhaps privately done ?)

1905 (CE 15th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Perf 12.

RH # CE# Type. was 1905 Description Mint Used
RH55 *40a 18 H52 10c brown / cinnamon 10.00 10.00
**RH55a -   -         Pin-perf. 15½ - -
RH56 64 22 H53 10c brown / cinnamon 10.00 10.00
RH56a -   H53a         yellow-brown / cinnamon 10.00 10.00
RH57 65 23 H54 20c blue / dull violet blue 10.00 8.00
RH58 65a 23 H55 20c blue / pale greenish blue 10.00 8.00
RH59 *** 13 H56 50c black / pale buff 18.00 18.00
RH60 66 24 H57 1p black / pale buff to yellow buff  18.00 18.00
RH61 67 31 H58 5p brown / cinnamon 15.00 15.00
RH62 68 32 H59 10p blue / pale bluish yellow 25.00 25.00

* This is listed in the 10th series.
**I have added H52a to accommodate the example above.
*** This does not appear to be listed by 'CE' or in the 2005 Yvert & Tellier catalogue.


Hiscocks added the following 2 notes:

Note 1. [RH58] seems not to have been catalogued previously.
Note 2. The perforations of [RH54 to RH62] are usually very rough.
  RH60 ?
This could be RH60, though the perforations look rather experimental.
But then the CE allocation of this to 1905 may be an error. - from RL

 

1906 (CE 16th. issue). Wove paper. No watermark. Imperf.

H60 H61 H62 H63
#29   RH63 #30   RH64 #31   RH65 #32   RH66

 

RH # CE# Type. was 1906 Description Mint Used
RH63 69 29 H60 1p blue / pink 50.00 50.00
RH64 70 30 H61 2p carmine / pale green 50.00 50.00
RH65 71 31 H62 5p red / pink 70.00 70.00
RH66 72 32 H63 10p carmine / pale bluish green 60.00 60.00

 

Obligatory Tax stamps.

As with many other countries, Colombia occasionally used obligatoy tax stamps to raise money for various projects.
The Scott catalogue has been helpful in identifying such stamps, but it is not always clear whether
they were for postal purposes only or included telegrams.

Red X-1949 Red X-1951
Used 9 August 1949   Perf. 10¾ Used in 1951 Perf. 10¾

According to Scott, these were issued September 1947 Perf. 12½ and in 1948 Perf.10½ to raise money for the Red Cross.
These two appear to have telegraphic cancels  -  from RL.

Whilst many of the obligatory tax stamps may have seen telegraphic usage, here are some that are more likely than most:

Sc-RA5 Sc-RA9 Sc-PT6
First issued in 1939, there was a 25c value that
according to Scott was
'not usable on postal matter'.
They do not say what it was used for
or the colour of it.
Similarly this issue of 1940,
there was a 25c value that Scott says
was 'not usable on postal matter'
The issue of 1948 (without the overprint) had
a 25c value that was for use on telegrams,
though in 1952 it was used postally
in dark grey and in blue-green.
They do not say the colour of the
one used on telegrams.

 

 

Cancels.

These were used on the early issues:
Telegraph cancel 1  Telegraph cancel 2 Telegraph cancel 3
From 'CE'.

Examples seen:

Franca cancel
FRANCA

TN cancel TN cancel Cancelada cancel
TN (Telegrafos Nales) - from RL TN (Telegrafos Nales) Cancelada

 

Telegrafos Nales cancel  Telegrafos Nales cancel  Correos Nales cancel
With the first one I thought this was a 'Telegrafos Nales' cancel. The other two make it clear that these are 'Correos Nales'.
I suppose it could be 'Telegrafos y Correos Nales', but the word order is usually 'Correos y Telegrafos'.
If these were used for postage, then examples on cover could provide valuable dating information.

Pedro P. Gomez ? cancel
Pedro P. Gomez ? cancel (note the different sizes of these two stamps that were scanned together !).

T ? cancel
T ? cancel. Usually this kind of cancel stands for 'Taxe' meaning postage due, but I cannot find any reference
to this being applied to Colombian Postage stamps, so perhaps it is a Telegraph cancel.

 

 

 

Acknowledgment of Receipt stamps ?

From 1893 to 1917 special stamps were issued with 'AR' as part of the design.
Only twice was an overprint of AR on normal postage stamps used, in 1903 and in 1904. They were not in circles.

The Scott catalogue has a note saying 'The handstamp "AR" in circle is believed to be a postmark.'
They do not state what stamps it is on, but their note appears just before the overprinted postage stamp of 1903.
Presumably there was a shortage of AR stamps around this time. Normal AR stamps were of 4c, 5c or 10c face values.

Rolf Lamprecht has provided scans of this series below with two types of AR on them:

AR-1 on RH48 AR-1 on RH50 AR-1 on RH52
RL-1   on RH48 RL-1   on RH50 RL-1   on RH52

 

AR-1 on RH48 AR-1 on RH49 AR-1 on RH50 AR-1 on RH52
RL-2   on RH48 RL-2   on RH49 RL-2   on RH50 RL-2   on RH52

These are from the same time period, but
If they are indeed cancels, then why these? Were they simply the first things that came to hand ?
They look like hand-stamps rather than cancels because they are carefully and centrally placed,
However, what purpose would they serve? The face values used are far higher than the normal AR stamps.
I suspect they were intended to create a saleable commodity.
There are probably other values from this set with AR on them, RH51 at least.
I am not sure why there were two types, perhaps one was used in 1903 and the other in 1904.

 

 

Telegraph Coupons

I'm not really sure of the purpose of these. The writing on the backs (all in shades of grey-black) translates as (approximately):
"This card can be exchanged free of charge for stamps of the Republic in the event of a claim for loss or delay in delivery of the telegram which this fee represents"
Translation courtesy of Bill from swheatlady on ebay, who adds: Sort of an early version of "If we don't deliver what we promised, you'll get a credit voucher, not a refund."

These would therefore seem to be analogous to the Telephone Coupons used in North America.

The backs of these have the instructions for use and the legal agreement.

Telegraph Coupon - back
Esta tarjeta girará libré de porte por la correos de la República en caso de reclamación por extravio ó demora en la entrega del telegrama cuyo porte representa.

I'm not exactly sure what this translates to in English, online translation Bing) says
"This card will turn delivered consignment note for the post of the Republic in the event of a claim for loss or delay in delivery of the telegram which porte represents."
Which doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Can anyone give a better translation ?

 

1893,  Type 1 with 'rays' above the eagle. Imperf.   Printed by Samper Matiz, Bogotá.

Type 1, Telegraph Coupon - 20c

Type 1, Telegraph Coupon - 40c
40c - from RL

Type 1, Telegraph Coupon - 50c

Type 1, Telegraph Coupon - 90c

1P Telegraph Card
The 1 peso - from RL

According to swheatlady on ebay, these are all documented by Higgins & Gage.

RH # Type. Description Mint Used
RC1 1 20c vermilion - -
RC2 1 40c orange-brown - -
RC3 1 50c violet - -
RC4 1 90c mauve - -
RC5 1 1p carmine - -

There will almost certainly be more to add.

 

 

1896?  Type 2 without the 'rays' above the eagle. Imperf or Perf. 13¼-13½.   Printed by Samper Matiz, Bogotá.

Type 2, Telegraph Coupon - 10c
At first I thought that this 10c had been trimmed, but RL has another just like it.

Type 2, Telegraph Coupon - 30c

Type 2, Telegraph Coupon - 50c

Type 2, Telegraph Coupon - 60c

RH # Type. Description Mint Used
RC5 2 10c green - -
RC6 2 30c blue - -
RC7 2 50c violet - -
RC8 2 60c red - -

There will almost certainly be more to add.

 

 

Seals

Telegraph Seals Telegraph Seals Telegraph Seals
Imprint 'LIT. NATIONAL' and 'AV-Gb.' on the left one and simply 'LIT. NATIONAL' on the right. imprints of 'LIT. COLOMBIA-BOGOTA' and 'LIT. J,CASSIS, BOGOTA'.

More colours
The second type comes in a variety of colours.

Steve Hiscocks made a start on cataloguing seals of the world in a book he published in 2007.
It was his hope to update it later, but unfortunately that was not to be.
His original book can be viewed at Telegraph Seals: A World Catalogue. There are links from the pages to my updates.

Alternatively you can view the latest page for Colombia.

 

 

If anyone can provide scans to help with this, I am happy to give appropriate credit.

 

 

Comments, criticisms, information or suggestions are always welcome.

Contact:     Emale

Please include the word 'Telegraphs' in the subject.

 

Alternatively Yahoo Group Yahoo-Group is a forum.

 

Last updated 25th. Sept. 2017

©Copyright Steve Panting 2012/13/14/15/16/17 except where stated.
Permission is hereby granted to copy material for which the copyright is owned by myself, on condition that any data is not altered and this website is given credit.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional  Valid CSS!